The cross stands at the heart of Christian faith—a symbol of salvation, redemption, and sacrificial love. For nearly 2,000 years, Christians have embraced the cross as the instrument through which Jesus Christ conquered sin and death. Yet one group stands in sharp contrast: Jehovah’s Witnesses. They not only reject the cross as the method of Jesus’ death, but they actively oppose it, even labeling it a pagan symbol.
But why? And is their rejection supported by the Bible, history, or archaeology?
In this article, we explore the theological and doctrinal reasons Jehovah’s Witnesses oppose the cross, and we demonstrate through Scripture, early Christian writings, and archaeological evidence that the cross is not a pagan invention—but the very foundation of our salvation.
1. Why Jehovah’s Witnesses Reject the Cross
Jehovah’s Witnesses teach that Jesus was executed on a simple upright stake (Greek: stauros), and not a cross. They claim the cross is a pagan religious symbol adopted by later “apostate” Christianity after the 4th century. Their rejection of the cross is based on several key points:
-
The word stauros originally meant “stake” in classical Greek.
-
They believe post-apostolic Christianity became corrupted and adopted pagan customs, including the cross.
-
The cross is considered a form of idolatry and is forbidden in their Kingdom Halls and literature.
-
Jehovah’s Witnesses believe Satan deceived Christians into revering a pagan emblem rather than the true teachings of Jesus.
This doctrine is heavily influenced by the writings of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, not Scripture itself.
2. The Word Stauros and Roman Crucifixion Methods
It is true that in classical Greek, stauros could mean a stake or pole. However, by the 1st century A.D., during the Roman occupation of Judea, the term had evolved. It often referred to a wooden cross-shaped structure used for executions.
The Romans employed multiple types of crosses:
-
Crux Simplex: an upright stake.
-
Crux Commissa (T-shaped).
-
Crux Immissa (†-shaped), the traditional Christian cross.
Historians like Seneca and Josephus described crucifixion as involving outstretched arms, which would be impossible on a simple vertical pole. This detail aligns with the crux immissa—the traditional cross with a crossbeam.
3. The Cross in the Bible
Though the Bible doesn’t describe the exact shape of the instrument used, several verses strongly suggest a crossbeam and validate the significance of the cross in Christian theology.
🔹 Jesus’ Hands Were Nailed Separately
“Unless I see the nail marks in His hands and put my finger where the nails were…”
— John 20:25
Plural “nails” (in the hands), as opposed to one, implies Jesus’ arms were outstretched, consistent with a crossbeam.
🔹 Simon of Cyrene Carried Jesus’ Cross
“As they were going out, they met a man from Cyrene, named Simon, and they forced him to carry the cross.”
— Matthew 27:32
If Jesus was crucified on a single stake, there would be no need for Simon to help carry it—it would not have had the heavy crossbeam (patibulum), which is what condemned men typically carried.
🔹 Paul Gloried in the Cross
“But far be it from me to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ…”
— Galatians 6:14
“…the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.”
— 1 Corinthians 1:18
Paul repeatedly uses the cross as a symbol of Christ’s victory and redemption—not merely as a method of execution but as the centerpiece of Christian identity.
4. Early Christians Honored the Cross
Even the earliest Christians, before Constantine, used the cross symbol:
-
Tertullian (AD 160–225): “The Christian is formed on the Cross of Christ… the cross on our foreheads.”
-
The Epistle of Barnabas (late 1st or early 2nd century) interprets Old Testament events as prefiguring the cross.
-
The Chi-Rho and Tau-Rho symbols—cross-like monograms—were used on Christian tombs and in catacombs.
Jehovah’s Witnesses claim the cross was a late addition, but these writings show that it was revered from the earliest generations of believers.
5. Archaeological Evidence: Crosses in the Holy Land
Recent discoveries from Dr. Titus Kennedy and other archaeologists have unveiled powerful visual evidence:
-
1st–2nd Century Mosaic Crosses in a Judeo-Christian synagogue in Nazareth, including Tau-Rho and Jerusalem crosses.
-
A Greek inscription at Beth Loya reading: “Jesus Christ is Present”, found alongside a Chi-Rho cross symbol.
-
Cross-shaped artwork from Beth Shean, Israel—an early Christian site still showing remnants of cross reverence.
-
Roman graffiti (like the Alexamenos graffito) mocking Christians shows a crucified figure on a cross, proving the perception of Christians worshiping a crucified Christ was already widespread in the 1st–2nd centuries.
These findings support the Christian view: early followers of Jesus used the cross as both a historic memory and a sacred symbol.
6. The Cross Is More Than a Symbol—It’s the Power of God
Jehovah’s Witnesses fear that honoring the cross is idolatry. But Christians don’t worship the wood—we honor what happened upon it.
The cross is:
-
The place where Christ bore our sin (1 Peter 2:24)
-
The demonstration of God’s love (Romans 5:8)
-
The means of our reconciliation (Colossians 1:20)
Rather than being a pagan emblem, the cross is the ultimate testimony of God’s grace.
Conclusion: The Cross Is Central to the Gospel
Jehovah’s Witnesses reject the cross due to flawed scholarship, selective history, and an effort to distance themselves from orthodox Christianity. But the Bible, the early Church, and archaeology tell a different story—one that confirms the cross of Christ is real, historical, and essential.
“He Himself bore our sins in His body on the cross, so that we might die to sin and live to righteousness; for by His wounds you were healed.”
— 1 Peter 2:24 (NASB)
The cross is not something to be despised—it is the victory of God over sin, death, and the grave.
![Get the Book](https://i0.wp.com/store.4witness.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/ccjw-en.jpg" "Get the Book")
